By Jordi Viladrosa
The Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted many aspects of our world and the way we understand it. Some innovative movements now realize that we still need to go a step further and bet on a real educational transformation. A re-reading of this book, originally published in 2008, makes us realize that sometimes some future projects have been in a kind of lethargy for too long and need to be awakened. We believe that this is the case with this book, which suggests a completely up-to-date plan of action that is useful both for students and for those who are already working in the profession.
The synthetic mind
We are challenged to go beyond the domain of an academic discipline and find the facilitating criteria for productive syntheses. The best known types of synthesis are:
- Complex concepts
- Rules and aphorisms
- Metaphors and images
- Wordless expressions
And its components:
- A goal (statement or notion)
- A starting point
- The selection of strategy, method and approach
- Drafts and feedback
Gardner considers that the most ambitious form of synthesis is found in interdisciplinary work, despite the fact that, except for creative people, adults often put up barriers that make it difficult.
One challenge facing the educational world is to make compatible a disciplined mind that does not lose the potential for synthetic thinking and, naturally, that gives it the attention it requires. A teaching style such as the one called metaknowledge may be the way forward.
In the author’s opinion, the effort to be made in the future will be the cultivation of the interdisciplinary mind, despite the continuing strength of the desire for specialization.
The creative mind
Despite the fact that everyone wants it, the fact is that people tend to be conservative, which implies reading the times in which we live well because the future belongs to innovative companies. Creativity arises when three elements come together:
- The individual
- His or her cultural environment
- The social field
We cannot speak of creativity if we do not recognize its contribution in a specific field and that it has modified it in some way. A creator is not exactly an expert because he stands out for his temperament, concerns and attitudes. He is rather a nonconformist.
Once again, the challenge is taken up by the educational system: although the mind of a 5-year-old child is at the height of its creative capacity, keeping this sensitivity alive involves offering options and alternatives to the same problem.
In the workplace it is also difficult for creativity to emerge if it is not part of its essence because, in fact, most opt for what is considered conventional. Gardner does not touch on the tendency to stay in the comfort zone at this point, but we can intuit it.
Although there is a tendency to consider creativity as individual, what the author calls the wisdom of crowds is gaining more and more ground, with the example of Wiquipedia as the best known case. The goal of a creator,” he says, “is to change the limits, to generate imbalance.
The respectful mind
It is a characteristic characteristic of humans the tendency to make groups, sometimes antagonistic. Overcoming rivalry and progressing towards mutual respect has education as the most useful way, which implies going beyond simple tolerance, which is no small thing.
The author is in favor of the concept of respect with the idea of accepting differences, that we learn to live with them and that we value those who are part of other groups.
Once again, Gardner thinks that educators are the ones who can contribute the most, but without forgetting that signs of respect must be detected in everyday life and in the workplace. There is always the possibility of finding common ground between people who see things differently.
The ethical mind
Having an ethical approach starts in the family home and is easier if one has grown up in an environment where the norm is a job well done, in Gardner’s expression. Whatever the background of people, individuals who behave as professionals are an example of ethical orientation in their work. This approach also applies to citizens who are committed to making the community in which they live better and proud.
From the studies and research cited by the author, the influence of the adult world surrounding the children, professional colleagues or the peer group also stands out. It is clear that all this does not generate consensus just for the sake of it, since what is the criterion for considering what can be considered ethical and what cannot? All societies accept virtues such as sincerity, integrity, loyalty, fairness and justice and none of them approve of falsehood, dishonesty, disloyalty or injustice.
As has been customary in this work, the author believes that it is educators who can do the most to shape an ethical mind in their students and they must do so by going beyond the achievement of academic excellence. When students understand why they are learning what they are being taught and how they can use it, they are much more likely to find ethical meaning in what they are doing.
At this point, the author believes that there is no unbridgeable separation between respect and ethics: it does not seem possible for someone who is ethical not to respect others, he concludes.
By way of conclusion
- The disciplined mind uses the ways of proceeding of the different academic disciplines, professions and arts.
- The synthetic mind knows how to select the relevant information and knows how to expose it.
- The creative mind raises new questions and proposes new solutions to the challenges that arise.
- The respectful mind understands and works well with those who are different.
- The ethical mind makes people good citizens and good professionals.
We find examples of the five minds both in formal education and in the professional field; they have an optimal period of development and it is necessary to identify pseudoforms that can lead us to take for good practices that are not.
Putting into practice the cultivation of these five minds has resistances and obstacles among which the author identifies the following: conservatism, passing caprice, hidden risks and impotence.
The author considers that the five minds have to be worked on in schools, by families and in the workplace. According to him, the future of our species depends on it.